“Ironically,” they continue, “it is the low scale of the South Street Seaport Historic District that makes this play so lucrative for the developer. They will benefit immensely from the spectacular views afforded by the enforcement of height limits in the rest of the district while getting a free pass.”
Local critics were able to scuttle a 2013 plan from HHC for a 50-story tower on the site of the nearby New Market Building, and have in the years since been vociferous in the opposition to other development plans floated by HHC. In November, 2019, Community Board 1 (CB1) enacted a resolution that, “reiterates our very strong support for retaining the existing zoning in the Seaport Historic District, which ensures that new buildings maintain the low-scale character of this very special area.”
HHC’s plan for 250 Water Street has nonetheless attracted a slew of endorsements. Former CB1 chair Catherine McVay Hughes says, “at a time when New York City is under so much stress from the pandemic and the economic downturn, this project is an exciting vote of confidence in the future, bringing affordable housing—a top priority for our community for many years—as well as long-term viability for the Seaport Historic District and Museum, and critical brownfield remediation, while removing a surface parking lot with legacy fossil-fuel infrastructure that has been an eyesore and a drag on community redevelopment for decades.”
Former CB1 vice chair Paul Hovitz says, “as a longtime resident of Southbridge Towers and someone who has been active in the community for decades, this exciting new plan is the first to incorporate a viable fiscal support mechanism for our cherished South Street Seaport Museum, the cultural center of this historic neighborhood. With a design appropriate to its upland location, this proposal will create a safe, more unified pedestrian experience for those of us who live nearby. And critically, it will bring the first mandatory affordable housing to CB1.”
Jessica Lappin, president of the Downtown Alliance, says, “the parking lot at 250 Water has long been a void, but also an opportunity: to invest in our local economy, to create jobs, and to build sorely needed affordable housing in CB1. The development proposed for the site is an opportunity that needs close and serious consideration. This plan would also bring stability to the South Street Seaport Museum, one of the area’s essential cultural institutions.”
HHC’s best chance in the upcoming ULURP process may be that the plan is supported by City Council member Margaret Chin, because the municipal legislature wields effective veto power over ULURP applications, and usually defers to the member in whose district a proposed project is located. (Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer also supports the plan.)
But not all elected officials are on board. State Assembly member Yuh-Line Niou says, “it’s disingenuous that HHC claims that their proposal has been shaped by elected officials and community engagement, when no formal plan has ever been presented to us for input. Every iteration of potential designs has violated the zoning limits, design guidelines, and principles agreed to by a coalition of elected officials, community organizations, and stakeholders. This plan is no different. Most importantly, it violates the 120 feet height limitation that HHC has been reminded of and ignored, time and time again.”
Ms. Niou continues, “HHC needs to come back to the community for more engagement and actually listen to create a plan that meets the needs of our community. And this current plan neither includes a large enough percentage of affordable housing, nor does it provide deeply affordable housing that matches the need we see in our community. This proposal, in its current form, is a non-starter and is not what our community needs.”
And the Seaport Coalition vows to, “continue to fight this inappropriate project [and] to reject this corporate greed and over-reach, by protecting one of our national treasures. We are looking at litigation and working with an attorney to that end. The formation of the team is in progress.”
Matthew Fenton
Hi, I have a couple dozen old watches non working if you are still accepting them!
John I would love ’em!
how best for me to get them? and thank you
Robert