On Tuesday, a five-judge panel of the New York State Supreme Court’s Appellate Division affirmed an earlier ruling (issued on December 3), which has the effect of halting once again the planned transfer of more than 200 men from the Lucerne Hotel, on the Upper West Side, to the Radisson Wall Street Hotel, located at 52 William Street. This order amounts to a partial victory for both sides in the lawsuit, granting some of what opponents of the plan were seeking, while also allowing the administration of Mayor Bill de Blasio limited latitude to begin implementing its proposal on a smaller scale than originally envisioned.
The Appellate Division’s ruling said, “the forced relocation of certain homeless residents from the Lucerne Shelter Hotel to the Radisson Hotel shelter is stayed,” but added that, “the City is permitted to relocate those residents who voluntarily choose to be moved.”
This means that the majority of homeless men currently housed within the Lucerne, who say they would prefer to remain there, cannot be compelled to move—but any among them who would prefer the facility on William Street are free to relocate. The order is slated to remain in effect until the Appellate Division’s May term, which means that the City is barred from relocating en masse the men now at the Lucerne cannot occur for at least five months.
The ruling, along with the prior order that it upheld, has the effect of overturning an earlier decision, issued on November 25 by a lower court, in which Justice Debra James ruled that the transfer, planned by the administration since September, could proceed.
Lawyers for opponents of the plan, representing three men currently residing at the Lucerne, argued that these men (along with the rest of the group facing relocation) will suffer irreparable harm if they are moved. Jason Zakai, one of the lawyers for this group, told the Broadsheet, “we are very pleased with this decision, maintaining the status quo, and allowing the residents to remain at the Lucerne. Not only can the residents continue to remain at the Lucerne, where they have been thriving, but those men who have recently obtained jobs on the Upper West Side will be able to remain employed while the stay is in effect.”
He continued, “we are hopeful that the City uses this opportunity to consider how successful the Lucerne Hotel has been as a temporary shelter and use it as a model for other temporary hotel shelters. We also hope that the City will consider using its available hotel shelter beds, such as at the Radisson, for the thousands of homeless residents currently in crowded congregate shelters and who are at serious risk for contracting COVID-19.”
But the legal battle surrounding the plan is far from over. Lawyers for the City plan to continue arguing that the Department of Homeless Services is operating within its legal authority in deciding to move the homeless men from the Upper West Side to the Financial District. And a local advocacy group, Downtown New Yorkers Incorporated, plans further legal action to prevent the City from housing other homeless men at 52 William Street.
Matthew Fenton